Certainly the time was that the Levites of culture would have sounded their trumpets against its walls as against an educational Jericho. Kennedy on the same day. Once you break down the radio, you don't have a radio anymore.
I just had to mention it because of the Arnold poem, obviously. An army without weapons of precision, and with no particular base of operations, might more hopefully enter upon a campaign on the Rhine, than a man, devoid of a knowledge of what physical science has done in the last century, upon a criticism of life.
I am going to ask whether the present movement for ousting letters from their old predominance in education, and for transferring the predominance in education to the natural sciences, whether this brisk and flourishing movement ought to prevail, and whether it is likely that in the end it really will prevail.
Later, in Crome Yellow he caricatured the Garsington lifestyle. Finally, even if they both can and do exert an influence upon the senses in question, how are they to relate to them the results.
But we may agree to all this, and yet strongly dissent from the assumption that literature alone is competent to supply this knowledge. And would always incline him to Greek. The usual education in the past has been mainly literary. Literature serves the desire in us that the good should be forever present; literature establishes a relation between new conceptions and and our idea for beauty and conduct.
On the other hand, Huxley's second wife, Laura Archerawould later emphasise in her biographical account, This Timeless Moment: And I begin to perfect the life that I live by perfecting the exemplar that I am prepared to follow in that life.
That the study of nature -- further than was requisite for the satisfaction of everyday wants -- should have any bearing on human life was far from the thoughts of men thus trained. It is not impossible that we shall hear this express exclusion of "literary instruction and education" from a college which, nevertheless, professes to give a high and efficient education, sharply criticised.
Huxley was an avid student, and during his lifetime he was renowned as a generalist, an intellectual who had mastered the use of the English language but was also informed about cutting-edge developments in science and other fields. He was just emphasizing the importance of studying classics as well for the sake of completeness.
Those who exercise such arts and trades, as they have their bodies, he says, marred by their vulgar businesses, so they have their souls, too, bowed and broken by them.
His father was a mathematics teacher at Ealing School until it closed,  putting the family into financial difficulties. A glance at TV commercials in the afternoons reveals advertisements by "technical schools" promising that knowing how to fix a car or program a computer is the ticket to the good life.
The tone of tentative inquiry, which befits a being of dim faculties and bounded knowledge, is the tone I would wish to take and not to depart from.
Snow's shallow views about In differing from them, however, I wish to proceed with the utmost caution and diffidence. And so he will probably be unsatisfied, or at any rate incomplete, and even more incomplete than the student of humane letters only.
An ardent pacifist, he had become alarmed at the growing military buildup in Europe, and determined to remove himself from the possibility of war. Perfect culture should apply a complete theory of life, based upon a clear knowledge alike of its possibilities and of its limitations.
Either term, utopia or dystopia, could correctly be used to describe Brave New World. For example, some ten years after publication of The Art of Seeing, inBennett Cerf was present when Huxley spoke at a Hollywood banquet, wearing no glasses and apparently reading his paper from the lectern without difficulty: The argument is the same in both.
The gibbon left is double size. Huxley preached the virtues of science and derisively dismissed all value in studying classics, and he wondered whether any rational person would choose to study classics over science.
"Science And Culture," by Thomas Henry Huxley. 1. Six years ago, Mr. Arnold tells us that the meaning of culture is "to know the best that has been thought and said in the world." It is the criticism of life contained in literature. There is no great force in the tu quoque argument, or else the advocates of scientific education might.
Huxley's book, sometimes described as ponderous and, remarkably from a contemporary perspective, also described as a popular account, is more massive than Mayr's shorter book, spanning close to pages in the edition under review. Huxley and Arnold After reading Thomas Henry Huxley’s lecture “Science and Culture” and Matthew Arnold’s response “Literature and Science”, I thought critically about what the two men have said and the basis of both arguments.
Literature and Science. by Matthew Arnold () 1 electronic edition by Ian Lancashire Practical people talk with a smile of Plato and of his absolute ideas; and it is impossible to deny that Plato's ideas do often seem unpractical and impracticable, and especially when one views them in connection with the life of a great work-a-day world like the United States.
Literature and Science. by Matthew Arnold () 1. Professor Huxley holds up to scorn mediaeval education, with its neglect of the knowledge of nature, its poverty even of literary studies, its formal logic devoted to "showing how and why that which the Church said was true must be true." at any rate, they have irresistible arguments.
Interpretation and Argument, FallSection D Go Back to My Home Page Science and Technology, and Society: Course Resources Home Page. Syllabus (The syllabus includes the complete course description, list of texts, assignment due dates/daily schedule, and more).; D, FallHuxley and arnold argument